In Pretoria, the seasons are not marked by cold so much as by meetings. Calendars fill with summits and statements, the language of cooperation drifting through conference halls like warm air. South Africa has learned to listen closely to these moments, to the promises that gather when emerging powers sit together and imagine a different balance in the world.
Yet lately, that imagination has felt slower to materialize. South African officials have voiced growing frustration at the pace of progress within BRICS, the bloc that brings together Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, recently expanded to include new members. The grouping was conceived as a counterweight, a platform for shared development and influence beyond traditional Western-led institutions. Years on, the movement has been deliberate, sometimes to the point of inertia.
At the heart of the concern is delivery. BRICS has spoken often about reforming global financial systems, boosting trade among members, and amplifying the voice of the Global South. Some steps have been taken—the establishment of the New Development Bank, discussions around local currency trade, and expansion to include additional countries. But for South Africa, facing domestic economic pressures and persistent inequality, the returns have not always matched the rhetoric.
Officials have pointed to slow implementation of projects and uneven follow-through on commitments. Infrastructure financing, once a central promise, has arrived cautiously. Trade integration remains complicated by distance, policy differences, and the sheer diversity of member economies. Even as the bloc grows larger, coordination has become more complex, its ambitions stretched across continents and political systems.
There is no suggestion of abandonment. South Africa continues to frame BRICS as strategically important, particularly in a world marked by fragmentation and competition. China’s economic gravity and India’s growth offer undeniable opportunities, while the presence of multiple emerging economies gives the bloc symbolic heft. But symbolism, Pretoria suggests, must eventually translate into tangible gains.
The expanded BRICS has raised expectations further. New members bring fresh perspectives and needs, but also test the group’s capacity to move as one. Consensus, always essential, now requires even more careful navigation. South Africa’s unease reflects a broader question facing the bloc: whether expansion strengthens momentum or diffuses it.
As another round of meetings approaches, the tone from Pretoria is not confrontational, but candid. Progress, officials say, is still possible, still desired. But patience is not infinite. In the quiet after speeches end and delegates depart, the measure of BRICS will rest not on how often it convenes, but on what endures between gatherings. For South Africa, the wait continues—not for vision, but for motion.
AI Image Disclaimer Visuals are AI-generated and serve as conceptual representations.
Sources South African government statements BRICS official communications International economic analysts Global development research institutes