In parts of Kentucky where the hum of machinery once marked the rhythm of daily life, a different kind of conversation has taken hold. Where once federal tax policy and political promises might have loomed large in public debate, many workers hit by recent layoffs are pointing fingers elsewhere — directly at the company that once offered them stable employment: Ford Motor Company.

For years, Kentucky has been known as a manufacturing heartland of the auto industry. Big assembly lines and plants — including the sprawling BlueOval SK battery facility in Hardin County — promised good jobs and future growth in the burgeoning electric vehicle sector. Those hopes dimmed late last year when Ford and its partner dissolved the joint venture responsible for that plant, leaving an estimated 1,600 workers laid off as the company shifted production to battery-storage systems.

In conversations with local employees, the central grievance has not been against national policy or even specifically federal leaders like Donald Trump. Workers acknowledge that changes in tax incentives and broader shifts in EV policy — including the removal of the federal EV tax credit — have played a role in weakening demand for electric vehicles. Yet their focus remains squarely on Ford’s corporate decisions, which they view as having raised expectations before ultimately pulling back. “Whatever the government policy would be, the company made the decision,” said one plant worker, capturing the sentiment of many in the community.

This is not to say broader policy pressures are absent from the equation. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear has publicly connected the shift in Ford’s plans to changes at the federal level, noting how the end of EV incentives influenced corporate strategy and Pennsylvania Republican leadership has pushed back on those points as well. But in the day-to-day reality of those left without work, it is the immediate employer whose choices feel most tangible and blame-worthy.

Workers and local leaders paint a picture of disappointment — and sometimes frustration — rooted in broken expectations. Many had counted on the electric vehicle battery plant as a source of middle-class jobs in a region still recovering from decades of industrial shifts and economic uncertainty. When corporate strategy changed, hopes for long-term economic security evaporated along with it.

This mix of corporate decision-making, economic pressure and local sentiment highlights how complex the story of American manufacturing has become. For Kentucky’s laid-off workers, it’s less a matter of political blame and more a matter of personal impact: jobs once promised by a major employer now gone, and no clear pathway back. In their view, that reality — and the company that made it — is what most needs to be addressed.

AI Image Disclaimer Visuals are AI-generated and intended for representation, not reality.

SOURCE CHECK — credible reporting relevant to this issue includes:

Reuters Local Kentucky news outlets (WUKY, WHAS11) BlueOval SK plant layoff coverage Worker sentiment reporting from regional sources Analysis of the BlueOval SK situation in Kentucky