China’s Commerce Ministry said it welcomes more Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers reaching agreements with the European Union on price commitments, signaling Beijing’s preference for negotiated solutions as trade tensions over EV exports continue.

The remarks come as Chinese automakers engage with European authorities on a case-by-case basis following the EU’s anti-subsidy investigation into electric vehicle imports from China. The probe, launched amid concerns about state support and market distortion, has led to the imposition of additional duties on certain Chinese-made EVs. European officials argue the measures are designed to ensure fair competition within the bloc’s automotive market.

Beijing has consistently criticized the investigation, describing it as protectionist, while also keeping diplomatic channels open. The Commerce Ministry’s latest statement suggests that China sees negotiated price undertakings as a pragmatic path forward. Under such arrangements, exporters agree to minimum price thresholds or other commitments in exchange for reduced or suspended tariffs.

For Chinese automakers, Europe represents a strategically important market. As domestic competition intensifies and price wars weigh on margins at home, overseas expansion has become central to growth strategies. European consumers have shown increasing interest in competitively priced electric vehicles, making the region a key destination for Chinese brands seeking global scale.

The dispute unfolds at a sensitive moment in EU-China relations. Brussels has been reassessing its economic ties with Beijing, balancing cooperation with what it calls “de-risking” in strategic sectors. Electric vehicles, batteries, and clean energy technologies have become focal points of that recalibration.

At the same time, European carmakers are navigating their own transition toward electrification, facing competition not only from Chinese imports but also from rising production costs and shifting regulatory standards. The EV trade case reflects broader questions about industrial policy, subsidies, and the future structure of the global automotive supply chain.

China’s endorsement of case-by-case negotiations indicates an effort to prevent a wider escalation. Broader retaliatory measures could affect other sectors, complicating an already complex trade relationship. Analysts note that both sides have strong incentives to contain the dispute, given deep economic interdependence and shared climate objectives tied to electric mobility.

Whether more companies ultimately secure price agreements remains uncertain. Much will depend on the commercial viability of the terms and the political appetite within the EU to balance consumer access to affordable EVs with domestic industry protection.

For now, Beijing’s message is clear: negotiated pricing commitments are preferable to prolonged tariff battles. The outcome of these talks could shape not only the trajectory of Chinese EV exports to Europe but also the tone of EU-China trade relations in the years ahead.