There was a time when childhood stretched long into the evening light — when boredom nudged imagination into motion and friendships were shaped face to face. Today, that light often glows from a different source: a small illuminated screen, humming quietly in bedrooms long after the house has fallen silent.
Dr. Rangan Chatterjee believes that glow has become more than a cultural shift. He calls excessive screen time and unrestricted social media use among young people “the most urgent public health issue” of our time — not because technology itself is inherently harmful, but because of how deeply and early it has embedded itself into developing lives.
In recent interviews, Chatterjee has pointed to mounting evidence linking heavy social media use with rising anxiety, depression, sleep disruption, and low self-esteem among teenagers. He argues that while smartphones have connected the world in remarkable ways, they have also introduced a steady stream of comparison, validation-seeking, and digital noise into the most formative years of life.
The concern, he suggests, is not only about content but about conditioning. Notifications arrive like tiny taps on the shoulder. Algorithms learn vulnerabilities and feed them back in loops. For adolescents — whose brains are still wiring impulse control, emotional regulation, and identity — this environment can amplify insecurity and social pressure.
Chatterjee has voiced support for proposals that would delay access to social media platforms until the age of 18. The idea is not framed as punishment or moral panic, but as protection — akin to age restrictions placed on alcohol or driving. Childhood, in this view, is a developmental phase that deserves insulation from certain commercial forces designed to capture attention.
Critics of such bans argue that outright prohibition may prove difficult to enforce and could drive usage underground. Others emphasize the positive aspects of online communities, especially for marginalized teens who find belonging and support through digital networks. They caution against oversimplifying a complex ecosystem where harm and help can coexist.
Still, the conversation has gained momentum. Across the UK and other countries, policymakers are weighing stricter age verification rules and stronger digital safety regulations. Parents, too, are navigating an uneasy balance — wanting to keep their children connected but not consumed.
Chatterjee’s broader message extends beyond legislation. He advocates for cultivating digital literacy, family boundaries around device use, and more screen-free time — particularly before bed. Sleep, movement, sunlight, and real-world social contact remain, in his telling, foundational medicines that cannot be replaced by pixels.
Perhaps what makes the debate feel so urgent is that it unfolds quietly. There are no sirens announcing a crisis of comparison or sleep deprivation. Instead, it appears in subtle ways: a teenager withdrawing, a restless night, a dip in self-worth triggered by curated images.
The question is not whether technology will remain — it surely will. The question is how society chooses to shape its role in young lives. Between connection and consumption, between innovation and protection, the path forward may depend on drawing lines that honor both progress and psychological well-being.
AI Image Disclaimer Images in this article are AI-generated illustrations, meant for concept only.
SOURCE CHECK (Credible Media Identified): The Guardian BBC News The Independent Sky News The Times