On February 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) released a significant number of files related to the late Jeffrey Epstein, totaling over 3.5 million pages, including 2,000 videos and 180,000 images. This release comes in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, designed to shed light on his criminal network and the complicity of various powerful individuals.

However, advocates for the victims are expressing dissatisfaction with the DOJ's handling of the release. They argue that many names and identifying details of individuals, some of whom had never previously been publicly identified, appear unredacted. Brad Edwards, an attorney representing Epstein survivors, stated that his firm received alarming calls just hours after the files were released, highlighting the ongoing trauma for those who trusted that their identities would be protected.

One significant concern is the lack of consistency in redactions. Multiple instances have been reported where the names of survivors were left unredacted, while protecting the identities of less vulnerable individuals. Advocates like Annie Farmer, a former victim, suggested these errors seem deliberate, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of the files.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche faced tough questions during a recent briefing, acknowledging that nearly 3 million pages of documents were retained, including sensitive material that necessitated caution, such as child pornography and personally identifiable information of victims. Despite these justifications, the advocacy group has expressed deep dissatisfaction, stating that victims should not continue to be scrutinized while the enablers of Epstein's trafficking operations remain shielded from accountability.

Following these developments, a federal judge in New York is scheduled to hear a motion urging the DOJ to take down the dedicated website housing these files until all sensitive information about victims is expunged. This case continues to unravel, shedding light on the intersection of privilege, power, and the plight of survivors caught in a system that seems to falter in its duty to protect them.

As advocates call for stricter oversight and better practices from the DOJ, the public remains vigilant, demanding more transparency in the ongoing fallout from Epstein's actions and the extensive network surrounding him.