A haze of early afternoon light settled across the broad esplanade outside the grand parliamentary halls in Dhaka on a crisp February day, where history seemed to unfurl in quiet, deliberate motions. Rows of lawmakers moved along polished stone steps, their footsteps echoing the rhythm of a nation still learning to hear its own heart again after the long upheavals that reshaped Bangladesh’s political landscape. Amid ceremonial handshakes and cautious smiles, there was another sort of murmur — one not carried in official speeches but in the whispered disquiet of streets, market lanes, and anxious living rooms alike.

At the center of this unfolding chapter sits the freshly sworn‑in government led by Tarique Rahman, whose return from exile and ascendancy to the premiership marks a watershed moment for the Bangladesh Nationalist Party after years in the wilderness of politics. The swearing‑in, staged under the late winter sky, was attended by foreign dignitaries and framed by talk of renewal and reconciliation — yet closer to the ground, the echo of discontent still lingered.

Not far from the august halls, the alliance under the banner of Jamaat‑e‑Islami and its partners gathered with a different sense of urgency. Their voices, raised first in protest and now in wary assertion, carried memories of marches that once filled the city’s arteries and the unsettled feeling left behind when ballots and ballots alone could not settle deeper grievances. Days before the solemn oaths were administered, leaders spoke of alleged irregularities from the recent election, of cries unheeded and accounts unsatisfied, and of a readiness to return to the streets if their concerns were brushed aside.

That narrative of protest, rooted in claims of post‑poll violence and calls for transparency, unfolded against the backdrop of constitutional contention. The question of a Constitution Reform Council — a body tied to reform proposals born of the 2024 uprising — became a point of friction within the broader alliance, and a symbol of the unresolved hopes that still course beneath Bangladesh’s political surface. Some asked: can the language of reforms and charters be equally binding to those who now hold formal power?

Yet on the day the newly elected lawmakers raised their hands to take their official pledges, the scene was more complex than a simple divide. Members of Jamaat‑e‑Islami ultimately stepped forward as well, signing their oaths with an expression of both participation and protest woven into their presence. It was a gesture that hinted at a willingness to engage within the system, even as unanswered questions and simmering discontent remained.

In the soft light of late afternoon, the grand buildings cast long shadows over gathering crowds; journalists lingered at barriers, representatives walked briskly toward waiting cars, and the pulse of the city carried on. Beyond the official script, there was a sense — not of conclusion, but of continued negotiation between aspiration and reality. Such is the quiet, persistent rhythm of democracy being practiced not just in charter, but in the patient, textured life of a nation.

AI Image Disclaimer Images are concept visuals generated using AI and do not depict actual photographs.

Sources Reuters The Guardian AP News TBS News bdnews24.com