Morning arrives softly in Tokyo’s government quarter, where glass towers catch the first light and the city begins its careful motion. Trains slide into stations on time, conversations resume where they left off, and policy, like the city itself, moves with practiced restraint. It is a rhythm shaped by proximity to power and the necessity of coexistence. For decades, Japan has lived beside China’s rise, close enough to feel its pull, distant enough to insist on its own course.

In London, a different morning unfolds, but the question is similar. As Keir Starmer prepares to define Britain’s posture toward Beijing, he inherits a relationship shaped by ambition, disappointment, and strategic uncertainty. Trade ties remain significant, security concerns persistent, and political assumptions unsettled. Japan’s experience offers no template, but it does provide a vocabulary—one built on patience, clarity, and an acceptance of contradiction.

Tokyo’s approach to China has rarely been simple. Economic interdependence deepened even as historical grievances and territorial disputes lingered. Japanese firms expanded across Chinese markets while governments exchanged measured words over the East China Sea. Rather than choosing engagement or resistance outright, Japan learned to practice both at once. Dialogue remained open, even during periods of diplomatic frost, while red lines were quietly but firmly drawn around security and sovereignty.

This balance has required discipline. Japanese leaders have invested heavily in regional alliances and domestic resilience, strengthening ties with the United States while also broadening partnerships across Southeast Asia and beyond. At home, supply chains have been reassessed, sensitive technologies protected, and public communication kept deliberately sober. The message has been consistent without being inflammatory: cooperation where possible, caution where necessary.

For Britain, emerging from years of rhetorical swings on China, the lesson may lie less in policy specifics than in tone. Japan has avoided framing its China relationship as a test of loyalty or ideology. Instead, it has treated it as a permanent feature of the landscape, something to be managed rather than solved. This has allowed space for economic engagement without illusions, and for security planning without spectacle.

Starmer’s challenge will be to restore coherence. Britain’s interests span trade, climate cooperation, and global stability, even as concerns over human rights and national security remain unresolved. Japan’s example suggests that credibility grows from consistency, from signaling intentions clearly and avoiding sudden pivots that unsettle allies and adversaries alike. It also shows the value of investing quietly in capacity—diplomatic, economic, and strategic—before crises demand it.

As Japan continues its careful navigation, it does so knowing that proximity sharpens awareness. The sea lanes remain busy, the conversations ongoing, the future unwritten. For Britain, watching from farther shores, the insight is subtle but steady: dealing with China is not an episode but a condition. The work lies not in finding the perfect stance, but in sustaining one that endures, morning after morning, under changing light.

AI Image Disclaimer Illustrations were created using AI tools and are not real photographs.

Sources Reuters Financial Times BBC News Japan Ministry of Foreign Affairs UK Foreign Office