In the predawn hush along Hong Kong’s waterfront, when the city’s glass towers reflect a pale and tentative light, there is a stillness that seems deeper than silence. The harbour sleeps beneath a low sky, and streets that once buzzed with the measured cadence of daily life lie quiet, as though waiting for some unspoken signal to stir motion again. Here, where thoughts once moved freely in the pages of newspapers and conversations in cafés, there now lingers a gentle somnolence that carries the weight of recent turns in public life.

For many years, Apple Daily stood as a vibrant thread in the fabric of this city’s print culture, its presses rolling before dawn and its headlines reaching into every corner of Hong Kong. Its founder, Jimmy Lai, was a familiar figure in those rooms of ink and dialogue, a man whose life became intertwined with the steady pulse of reporting and reflection. He built a newspaper that thrummed with the rhythms of both ordinary news and spirited debate, where voices — many cautious, some bold — found their mark on paper before the sun had fully risen.

Yet the motion that once seemed so ordinary has transformed under laws whose reach deepened in the years following mass protests and political turmoil. A national security law, imposed in 2020, reshaped the landscape of expression and set new boundaries for what could be said, printed, or published. Within that evolving framework, Lai faced charges that traced not to violence but to what he printed and how he was perceived to act with others beyond Hong Kong’s shores. In December, judges found him guilty of conspiring to collude with foreign forces and of publishing materials deemed seditious, drawing on provisions that critics say cast a long shadow over speech once considered legitimate.

Last week, the familiar hum of printing presses was replaced by the measured cadence of judicial pronouncement: Lai was sentenced to 20 years in prison. In the calm language of legal decree, that span of years eclipses much of a lifetime, especially for a man now in his late seventies. Friends, supporters, and observers have described the term, given his age and health, as effectively a de facto death sentence — not merely a span of years locked away from the world, but a closing of the horizon itself. In cafés and alleyways, where talk of bread and business once wove through the air, some now speak in low tones of absence and the weight carried by words that once seemed light.

Reactions have rippled beyond these shores. Rights groups and governments have voiced concern, saying the severity of the sentence deals a blow to the notion of a free press in a city once seen as a bastion of openness in the region. There have been calls for consideration of humanitarian grounds, reflections on the rule of law, and debates over how nations balance security with the liberties that once seemed assured. At the same time, authorities in Hong Kong maintain that the sentence upholds national security and the rule of law, pointing to statutes that have been enforced with increasing firmness over recent years.

In the quiet aftermath of this ruling, daily life in Hong Kong unfolds with its habitual cadence: trams glide along their tracks, markets offer their goods in measured exchanges, and the harbour continues its endless cadence against piers and hulls. Yet beneath the ordinary rhythms there remains a tension between what was and what is, and between the motion of ordinary life and the stillness that follows a decision whose reach extends well beyond the courtroom.

Hong Kong media tycoon and pro‑democracy advocate Jimmy Lai has been sentenced to 20 years in prison under the city’s national security law after being convicted of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and of publishing seditious materials. The sentence, the longest imposed under the law to date, has drawn international concern from rights groups and foreign governments who say it reflects a further erosion of press freedom in the city. Authorities have defended the ruling as consistent with national security provisions.

AI Image Disclaimer

Illustrations were created using AI tools and serve as conceptual representations.

Sources (Media Names Only)

Reuters Associated Press BBC News The Guardian Amnesty International